Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital addict

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK1. (non-admin closure) ——SerialNumber54129 16:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Digital addict

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non WP:MEDRS compliant, WP:SYNTH, important issue, new article proposed E.3 (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:17, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Nominator's rationale consists of "This article is bad. We should have a better article on this topic." However, deletion is not cleanup. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 18:56, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I 100% agree with the above statement. I have attempted thorough cleanup by citing previously uncited statements that were unable to be cited on the page I made digital media use and mental health. I hope more can come across from this page but I can’t see it yet. In my opinion there are three options 1. Keeping both pages and cleaning up both
2. Keeping this page and improving it with the citations and text on the other page which is much more policy compliant, with careful consideration of the title. 3. Deleting this page and moving all useable content to the other. Thanks to everyone. —E.3 (talk) 01:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.